Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Cyclic AMP and cyclic GMP may play opposing roles in influencing force of contraction in mammalian myocardium

Abstract

CYCLIC AMP and cyclic GMP have been suggested to play opposing regulatory roles in several biological systems1. Supporting evidence for the yin yang hypothesis of opposing biological regulation has been obtained in sympathetic ganglia2,3 and pyramidal neurones in the rat cerebral cortex4. In the mammalian heart, the role of cyclic AMP in mediating the positive inotropic response to catecholamines was advanced by the observation that the inotropic effect was preceded by an increase in cyclic AMP levels5. On the other hand, the levels of cyclic GMP were found to be increased after cholinergic stimulation6. In frog, oscillations of cyclic AMP7 and cyclic changes in the levels of cyclic AMP and cyclic GMP8 during the cardiac cycle have been reported. The importance of cyclic AMP for the inotropic effects of catecholamines was confirmed by the observation that the dibutyryl derivative of cyclic AMP exerted a positive inotropic effect in cat papillary muscles9 and in the isolated perfused hearts from rabbits, rats and guinea pigs10. I now report a direct negative inotropic effect of 8-Br-cyclic GMP on force of contraction (Fc) in rat auricles and papillary muscles from cats.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goldberg, N. D., Haddox, M. K., Hartle, D. K., and Hadden, J. W., Proc. Fifth Int. Congr. Pharmac. (edit by Maxwell, R. A., and Acheson, G. H.), 146–149 (Karger, Basel, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  2. McAfee, D. A., and Greengard, P., Science, 178, 310–312 (1972).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kebabian, J. W., Steiner, A. L., and Greengard, P., J. Pharmac. exp. Ther., 193, 474–488 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stone, T. W., Taylor, D. A., and Bloom, F. E., Science, 187, 845–847 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheung, W. Y., and Williamson, J. R., Nature, 207, 979–981 (1965).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. George, W. J., Polson, J. B., O'Toole, A. G., and Goldberg, N. D., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 66, 398–403 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brooker, G., Science, 182, 933–934 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wollenberger, A., et al., Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun., 55, 446–452 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Skelton, C. L., Levey, G. S., and Epstein, S. E., Circulation Res., 26, 35–43 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kukovetz, W. R., and Pöch, G., Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmak., 266, 236–254 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Meinertz, T., Nawrath, H., and Scholz, H., Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol., 333, 197–212 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Meinertz, T., Nawrath, H., and Scholz, H., Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmac., 278, 165–178 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. TenEick, R. E., Nawrath, H., McDonald, T. F., and Trautwein, W., Pflugers Arch. ges. Physiol., 361, 207–213 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schneider, J. A., Brooker, G., and Sperelakis, N., J. molec. cell. Cardiol., 7, 867–876 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cubeddu, L. X., Barnes, E., and Weiner, N., J. Pharmac. exp. Ther., 191, 444–457 (1974).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

NAWRATH, H. Cyclic AMP and cyclic GMP may play opposing roles in influencing force of contraction in mammalian myocardium. Nature 262, 509–511 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/262509b0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/262509b0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing