Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

Good and bad science in US schools

One-third of US states have unsatisfactory standards for teaching evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Notes

  1. *This Commentary is a version of a longer report to be published on 26 September which contains full details of the analysis and criteria for the rankings of states described here. The full report can be obtained from the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation in Washington DC at 202-223-5452 or from http://www.edexcellence.net. It will also be presented at a public AAAS symposium, “The Teaching of Evolution in US Schools: Where Politics, Religion, and Science Converge”, on 26 September.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence S. Lerner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lerner, L. Good and bad science in US schools. Nature 407, 287–290 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35030204

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35030204

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing