Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communications Arising
  • Published:

Extinction and climate change

Nature volume 482, pages E4–E5 (2012)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Arising from F. He & S. P. Hubbell Nature 473, 368–371 ()(2011)10.1038/nature09985.

Statistical relationships between habitat area and the number of species observed (species–area relationships, SARs) are sometimes used to assess extinction risks following habitat destruction or loss of climatic suitability. He and Hubbell1 argue that the numbers of species confined to—rather than observed in—different areas (endemics–area relationships, EARs) should be used instead of SARs, and that SAR-based extinction estimates in the literature are too high. We suggest that He and Hubbell’s SAR estimates are biased, that the empirical data they use are not appropriate to calculate extinction risks, and that their statements about extinction risks from climate change2 do not take into account non-SAR-based estimates or recent observations. Species have already responded to climate change in a manner consistent with high future extinction risks.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. He, F. & Hubbell, S. P. Species–area relationships always overestimate extinction rates from habitat loss. Nature 473, 368–371 (2011)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Thomas, C. D. et al. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427, 145–148 (2004)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Williamson, M. Species–area relationships at small scales in continuum vegetation. J. Ecol. 91, 904–907 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Williamson, M. Island Populations (Oxford Univ. Press, 1981)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Maclean, I. M. D. & Wilson, R. J. Recent ecological responses to climate change support predictions of high extinction risk. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 12337–12342 (2011)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas, C. D. et al. Biodiversity conservation: Uncertainty in predictions of extinction risk/Effects of changes in climate and land use/Climate change and extinction risk (reply). Nature 430, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02719 (2004)

  7. Franco, A. M. A. et al. Impacts of climate warming and habitat loss on extinctions at species’ low-latitude range boundaries. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 1545–1553 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilson, R. J. et al. Changes to the elevational limits and extent of species ranges associated with climate change. Ecol. Lett. 8, 1138–1146 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sinervo, B. et al. Erosion of lizard diversity by climate change and altered thermal niches. Science 328, 894–899 (2010)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, I.-C. et al. Asymmetric boundary shifts of tropical montane Lepidoptera over four decades of climate warming. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 20, 34–45 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Raxworthy, C. J. et al. Extinction vulnerability of tropical montane endemism from warming and upslope displacement: a preliminary appraisal for the highest massif in Madagascar. Glob. Change Biol. 14, 1703–1720 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pounds, J. A., Fogden, M. P. L. & Campbell, J. H. Biological response to climate change on a tropical mountain. Nature 398, 611–615 (1999)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pounds, J. A. et al. Widespread amphibian extinctions from epidemic disease driven by global warming. Nature 439, 161–167 (2006)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Carpenter, K. E. et al. One-third of reef-building corals face elevated extinction risk from climate change and local impacts. Science 321, 560–563 (2008)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, I.-C., Hill, J. K., Ohlemüller, R., Roy, D. B. & Thomas, C. D. Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science 333, 1024–1026 (2011)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. *Department of Biology, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.,

    Chris D. Thomas & Mark Williamson

Authors
  1. Chris D. Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark Williamson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

C.D.T. and M.W. jointly conceived and wrote the communication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris D. Thomas.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Declared none.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, C., Williamson, M. Extinction and climate change. Nature 482, E4–E5 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10858

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10858

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene